Many fleets have been eyeing propane-fueled vehicles over the past few years as viable alternatives to their aging diesel-powered buses. Tighter transportation budgets, paired with aftertreatment maintenance issues have caused fleet managers to rethink diesel and look for alternatives that are more cost-effective, cleaner and easier to maintain.
“Nowadays, fleet managers are looking for different alternatives to ease the stresses that they are experiencing with their current fleet,” said Ken Hedgecock, vice president of sales, marketing and service at Thomas Built Buses. “Fleet managers of pre-2007 school buses are sick and tired of dirty exhaust and fumes while technicians of post-SCR school buses struggle with maintenance issues and school buses down for repairs. There is no clear winner in alternative fuel options today, but for many fleet managers, anything that is better than what they currently have.”
In a recent survey, 13% of respondents reported purchasing new propane school buses, up from 12% two years ago. But now it seems that districts are eyeing a new “alternative” – gasoline. While not technically an alternative fuel, gasoline is touted for its lower cost, ease of maintenance and accessibility across the country compared to propane.
Like clean-diesel, gasoline is more accessible across the United States and Canada for fueling that takes place outside of the bus yard. From field trips to extracurricular travel, transportation managers don’t need to plan the route based on fuel availability as they would for propane. On top of that, fleets report spending less money upfront on acquiring gasoline-powered school buses and less on the fuel itself. But, some argue that gasoline school buses may be too good to be true.
“The lower cost to purchase a new gasoline school bus may be tricking many districts into believing that gasoline school buses are a better value,” said Hedgecock. “Fuel efficiency, operating range, long-term durability and resale value of gasoline- and propane-powered school buses are much lower than those of newer clean-diesel school buses. This means that even though gasoline buses cost less to purchase, over the life of the bus, they end up costing fleets more than clean-diesel school buses.”
Fuel economy is one of the key misleading indicators when it comes to costing out a gasoline school bus. While gasoline cost per gallon is typically lower than that of clean-diesel, the cost of the fuel is less stable and less efficient compared to diesel. Unlike gasoline, diesel prices tend to remain more stable throughout the year, providing fleet managers more control of their budget from one month to the next.
Plus, diesel engines are significantly more efficient than gasoline engines, which means better fuel economy and increased fuel savings. On average, a clean-diesel school bus can travel around 510 miles on a tank of diesel vs. only 270 miles on gasoline, based on the same, standard-sized fuel tanks. Newer engines, like the Detroit™ DD5™ and DD8™ diesel engines, are even showing an additional three percent increase in fuel efficiency. This difference in range and fuel economy quickly mitigates the cost difference between gasoline and diesel fuel.
Ease of maintenance is another huge consideration when switching to alternative fuels. Many districts are touting ease of maintenance and greater technician availability when it comes to repairing gasoline engines. While more technicians are indeed familiar with gasoline engines, experts argue that the ease of school bus engine maintenance for all engine types has improved over the years. Today, newer engines like the DD5 and DD8 dramatically ease maintenance with some of the longest service intervals in their class, and remote diagnostic services provide an extra layer of support for constrained shops with limited technician bandwidth.
At one time a pain point for technicians, aftertreatment systems are also no longer the headaches they used to be. Now, through state-of-the-art variable cam-phasing technology, available through Detroit™, and the Stay Warm feature, available through Cummins, new clean-diesel aftertreatment systems allow additional heat to enter the exhaust stream, enabling efficient operation of the aftertreatment system in low speed, stop-and-go operations.
Yet another factor that is often not being considered is engine life. Gasoline engines, like other alternative fuel engines, aren’t built from the ground up for the medium-duty market. Over the long haul, newer diesel engines will last 15-20 years in a fleet while a gasoline engine may need to be replaced once or even twice during the life of a school bus.
“All of these are important for fleet managers to stop and consider when choosing a new school bus,” says Hedgecock. “It’s understandable that fleet managers want to run to something better for their next school bus purchase. But better doesn’t always mean different. With the revolutionary improvements that we’ve seen in the diesel engine in just the past two to three years, fleet managers no longer need to move to a different fuel type to experience more reliable, cost-effective school buses. Many fleet managers today are realizing significant cost reductions and ease of maintenance with newer clean-diesel school buses. Of course, there is no one-size-fits-all model for all districts. Some districts favor propane, while others favor CNG. And that’s okay. Purchasing a new school bus is a huge investment, an investment that many districts will live with for 10-15 years. It’s important to weigh the pros and cons of each fuel type thoroughly.”
So how does a district choose the best engine type for their fleet? Talking with your local dealer and others in the industry are great places to start.
“When districts talk with their peers who recently purchased a new school bus, they may be surprised by what they discover,” continues Hedgecock. “The majority of districts continue to purchase new diesel school buses, and with good reason. Today’s diesel engines are more than 90 percent cleaner than they were in 2006 and are comparable or even cleaner than other fuel types based on EPA-regulated emissions standards. Plus, diesel remains the most fuel-efficient engine in the market, providing up to 50% better fuel economy compared to other similar-size gasoline, propane or compressed natural gas engines. Transportation directors can learn a lot by talking to one another; exchanging anecdotes is oftentimes the best place to start figuring out what may be best for your fleet.”